3 ms·
Digging a little deeper... (0 degrees Celsius) + (0 degrees Celsius) - (0 degrees Celsius) = 0 degrees Celsius (0 degrees Celsius) - (0 degrees Celsius) =
by JangoSteve 16y ago
Digging a little deeper...
(0 degrees Celsius) + (0 degrees Celsius) - (0 degrees Celsius) = 0 degrees Celsius
(0 degrees Celsius) - (0 degrees Celsius) = 0 kelvin
(0 degrees Celsius) + (0 kelvin) = 0 degrees Celsius
The last 2 of the 3 are wrong, so I'd say this is definitley a bug.
EDIT: I think I figured it out. It's converting everything after the first temperature to Kelvin, without converting the first temp to Kelvin, and then just doing the arithmetic on the numbers...
0C + 0C => 0C + 273K => 0 + 273 = 273
0C + 0C - 0C => 0 + 273 - 273 = 0
0C - 0C => 0 - 273 = -273 = 0K (ok, weird this one then converts back to K)
0C + 0K => 0 + 0 = 0
EDIT 2: While this does match the results seen by google, I think _delirium's solution is more likely the reason.
- fleitz 16y ago0C - 0C => 0 - 273 = -273 = 0K (ok, weird this one then converts back to K) Your math/logic is wrong, (A - A) => (B - A) you converted 0C to both 0 and 273. Convert everything to Kelvin and it all makes sense. It's non-intuitive because 0C indicates a positive amount of energy rather than no energy as 0K does.
- JangoSteve 16y agoIf you read my comment leading up to that, you'd see why I did it that way. But I agree with the other comment that it's more likely Google is just converting everything to Kelvin as it's canonical calculating form.
- iacvlvs 16y agoNo. It's converting EVERYTHING to K, then doing the arithmetic, then converting the result to C. 0C + 0C = 273K + 273K = 546K = 273C 0C + 0C - 0C = 273K + 273K - 273K = 273K = 0C 0C - 0C => 273K - 273K = 0K 0C + 0K = 273K + 0K = 273K = 0C
- JangoSteve 16y agoYup you guys are right. This is what I get for trying to overanalyze a problem at 3am.