I've whitelisted JS from this site, because I "trust" it enough. If HN sold their comment code through some opaque web of third parties, I would be more cautio

I've whitelisted JS from this site, because I "trust" it enough. If HN sold their comment code through some opaque web of third parties, I would be more cautious. You're clearly an insider, and I'm clearly an outsider, so you understand the nuances here better than I do. What's your concept of securely executing untrusted code? Should users give up control over what runs on their machines? Should they know whose code may run before and/or after it does? Or what data it can or has already exfiltrated?