3 ms·
Ah, but you did not precisely define the area in cm^2 of hair which constitutes a full head of hair vs bald!???!? Clearly this is a sham and you needed at leas
by jcranberry 9y ago
Ah, but you did not precisely define the area in cm^2 of hair which constitutes a full head of hair vs bald!???!?
Clearly this is a sham and you needed at least 31^47 participants in this study you charlatan!
- function_seven 9y agoShit. I just rechecked my data, and it appears the "full-head-of-hair" group still had 482cm² of shiny scalp. I need to fire my measurement tech and issue a recall...