4 ms·
So your point is that, even though the reporters neglected to explain (or understand) the term neurotic, they were justified because the ultimately correct expl
by akvadrako 9y ago
So your point is that, even though the reporters neglected to explain (or understand) the term neurotic, they were justified because the ultimately correct explanation is that it's meaningless in context?
In that case, the only proper response is to report that the word neurotic is not scientific.
- stcredzero 9y agoIn that case, the only proper response is to report that the word neurotic is not scientific. I think that's a discussion worth having. That would've been a lot better than just firing the guy!
- bduerst 9y agoNo, my point is that worrying about the semantics of the word neurotic is a pointless exercise because even when correctly understood in the case of the big five, it's still incorrectly used scientifically by Damore.
- scruple 9y agoBut it's disingenuous to the point of the memo, to the point that it's _deliberately_ misleading to the general public... Leading to the moral outrage.
- bduerst 9y agoHow was it deliberately misused for moral outrage? I thought the context here is that people flat out misunderstood it, not deliberately misused it. In either case, whether by Damore or the public, deliberate or not, it was definitely being misused. Splitting hairs by whom is the pointless exercise.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]