3 ms·
The article has Professor Grant himself (the guy who is cited in all of these discussions) rebutting what Scott wrote in the blog post. It's well worth the read
by dqv 9y ago
The article has Professor Grant himself (the guy who is cited in all of these discussions) rebutting what Scott wrote in the blog post. It's well worth the read.
- DuskStar 9y agoWhich article? Not the feature from TC, I'd presume. If there's a good rebuttal to what Scott wrote out there, I'd love to read it! There's Grant's response added by Scott to the comments [0], but I don't think that really qualifies as a rebuttal. [0] http://slatestarcodex.com/2017/08/07/contra-grant-on-exaggerated-differences/#comment-533527 http://slatestarcodex.com/2017/08/07/contra-grant-on-exagger...
- dqv 9y agoI used poor wording - it's just Grant's response, not a rebuttal. I appreciated that Scott included it.