15 ms·
Actually the opposite, by taxing land in high demand urban cores it would incentivize more efficient use of the land - i.e. building up to support more occupant
by 0wing 9y ago
Actually the opposite, by taxing land in high demand urban cores it would incentivize more efficient use of the land - i.e. building up to support more occupants or higher value economic activity. [1]
Deregulating the zoning restrictions would allow more buildings to be built. [2]
Here is a startling fact: in 2014 there were 142,417
housing starts in the city of Tokyo (population 13.3m, no
empty land), more than the 83,657 housing permits issued
in the state of California (population 38.7m), or the
137,010 houses started in the entire country of England
(population 54.3m).
Tokyo’s steady construction is linked to a still more
startling fact. In contrast to the enormous house price
booms that have distorted western cities — setting young
against old, redistributing wealth to the already wealthy,
and denying others the chance to move to where the good
jobs are — the cost of property in Japan’s capital has
hardly budged.
This is not the result of a falling population. Japan has
experienced the same “return to the city” wave as other
nations. In Minato ward — a desirable 20 sq km slice of
central Tokyo — the population is up 66 per cent over the
past 20 years, from 145,000 to 241,000, an increase of
about 100,000 residents.[3]
With artificially constrained supply from Prop 13, there's dozens of empty lots and empty units just doing nothing of value. It's surreal to hear about stories from baby boomers about moving across the country to NYC/SF/LA/etc and being able to easily find a job and affordable housing in a major city, often while attending school at the same time. The same generation has now pulled the ladder up behind them to spit down on future generations.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Land_value_tax#Efficiency https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Land_value_tax#Efficiency
[2] http://urbankchoze.blogspot.ca/2014/04/japanese-zoning.html http://urbankchoze.blogspot.ca/2014/04/japanese-zoning.html
[3] https://www.ft.com/content/023562e2-54a6-11e6-befd-2fc0c26b3c60 https://www.ft.com/content/023562e2-54a6-11e6-befd-2fc0c26b3...
- robrenaud 9y agoJapan is weird. They demo/rebuild housing much more than in other places in the world. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/community/2014/03/31/how-tos/japans-30-year-building-shelf-life-is-not-quite-true/#.WlPZnXWnFFQ https://www.japantimes.co.jp/community/2014/03/31/how-tos/ja... You'd really want some kind of net housing units measure, rather than housing starts, to compensate this when comparing Tokyo to other cities.
- aidenn0 9y agoNot just Prop 13; I discussed with a contractor the possibility of building a new home here about a decade ago; estimate for cost of obtaining permits: $250k. The lot is still empty. [edit] Also due to house vs. lot-size restrictions the house would have been limited to just over 2000 square feet. This is regardless of the number of stories (i.e. a 2-storey house would need to have about a 1000 square foot footprint, but a ranch could have about 2000 square foot footprint).
- crdoconnor 9y ago>Actually the opposite, by taxing land in high demand urban cores it would incentivize more efficient use of the land That's exactly what I was saying. The owners of inner city land pay very little cost for monopolizing land that could be put to better use. It's a store of value that is unlikely to go down in value. There is nothing to offset the instinct to hoard. >The same generation has now pulled the ladder up behind them to spit down on future generations. All of the "it was boomers what done it" is just the 1% playing identity politics as a means of scapegoating and divide and conquer. At the end of the day, the 1% millenial children of 1% boomers are going to be the beneficiaries of this ladder pull-up.