3 ms·
Has what worked in the past? Admitting you were wrong and apologizing? Sure it's a good way of resolving conflicts if you were actually wrong. People grow and
by jgh 9y ago
Has what worked in the past? Admitting you were wrong and apologizing? Sure it's a good way of resolving conflicts if you were actually wrong. People grow and change throughout life, I don't think that being a knucklehead in the past necessarily means you're a knucklehead now.
- saint_fiasco 9y agoAdmitting you were wrong and apologizing in public, specifically. An individual can be reasoned with, placated. You can make reparations, promises that the other person will believe because of a precedent of mutual trust and forgiveness. However, you can't do that with an angry mob.
- rainbowmverse 9y agoThe angry mob is irrelevant. There are more individuals watching quietly than people making their positions public. The mob will chill when their friends ask them to post-apology. I have been on all sides of this phenomenon: the chiller, the chillee, the apology. It works.
- saint_fiasco 9y agoThe mob is big enough that they are not necessarily even friends with each other. People who ask the mob to chill risk being mobbed in turn. Punishment of non-punishers is how mobs sustain themselves.
- pluto9 9y agoThe angry mob is the reason people like James Damore get fired while his openly white-male-hating coworkers are free to post their opinions on Twitter with no consequences at all. They are not at all irrelevant.
- wmil 9y agoIt doesn't work in the case of moral panics like this. Apologizing only convinces the people who are called for his head that they were correct. Usually it will lead to further sanctions.