> From the description... Thanks, that is an interesting hypothesis, I had not considered it. The number of choices you have to go trough though should grow wi

> From the description... Thanks, that is an interesting hypothesis, I had not considered it. The number of choices you have to go trough though should grow with the inverse of the frequency of the word, that means you could have to go trough an inordinate amount of choices to get to an unlikely word... luckily with such "stateless" paradigms I can just simulate it for every single word! > Edit: You could also... This is exactly the improvement we are currently working on!