sounds like you have some valuable experience to share, but it would be helpful to breakdown how much you are a disagreeing with the article and how much you ar

sounds like you have some valuable experience to share, but it would be helpful to breakdown how much you are a disagreeing with the article and how much you are disagreeing with tom cruise style psychiatry denial. clearly there have been people helped by psychiatry, but clearly a lot of it has been debunked because, not a surprise, science is supposed to debunk itself and self-correct and iterate to better things. so while in general it’s a losing proposition to say the field has no value, we need to separate the concept of science from specifics of how it’s practiced in particular cases. this is not a black and white issue. some drugs and practices and practitioners can be life saving while others are the opposite. it would be interesting to know how right this article gets things for the claims it makes.