4 ms·

This seems close to assuming that financial value is ultimately the only value of art. That couldn't be further from the truth.

• WalterBright 9y ago
  Ultimately it is. If nobody is willing to pay $10 for something, then its value is less than $10.
  • exolymph 9y ago
    There are multiple definitions of "value" and not all are financial.
  • yesenadam 9y ago
    You don't seem to have heard of any value except monetary. (OK, maybe that's not fair/likely, but you sure talk like it.) I guess it's (just?) a confusion in the word 'value'. The way you are talking of the value of art in money terms is.. well... People who love art don't talk like that. Do you speak of love, life, health etc in similar terms? Oh anyway. It's pretty amazing to me to hear such views in person. I mean, scary, horrific, chilling. It only happened to me once in my life before this thread. I think...you have been brainwashed to think that all value is (or can be put) in terms of money. Is it possible to be happy while thinking like that? ..There are a thousand things I could say to that, not sure where to start. (Unfortunately I've learnt quickly in my brief time here that discussion on HN with those of different views is very counterproductive. It has been so far anyway.)