7 ms·
These are nice, but I still find that Zurb's example's are still the best out there. http://www.zurb.com/article/266/super-awesome-buttons-with-css3-and-rgba h
by Griever 16y ago
These are nice, but I still find that Zurb's example's are still the best out there.
http://www.zurb.com/article/266/super-awesome-buttons-with-css3-and-rgba http://www.zurb.com/article/266/super-awesome-buttons-with-c...
I use them on nearly all of my projects.
- bemaniac 16y agoThe main difference is that these buttons require no images, while the Zurb ones still require an image. The lack of images makes the buttons highly scalable.
- kasted 16y agoreally easy to convert them to linear gradients though...
- Griever 16y agoAgreed. That is their main downside but honestly I haven't had any issues with them setup that way. I've been reusing them for both images big and small and it seems to come out alright.
- charliepark 16y agoOn Github there's a version of the Zerb buttons that's pure CSS. I haven't tried it in IE, but it looks good on Safari and Firefox: http://github.com/gr2m/awesome-buttons http://github.com/gr2m/awesome-buttons.
- ronnier 16y agoI like these[1] for webkit browsers. I'm using them on http://ihackernews.com http://ihackernews.com for the login and reply buttons. [1] http://mwhenry.com/blog/2009/11/shiny-css-only-iphone-buttons/ http://mwhenry.com/blog/2009/11/shiny-css-only-iphone-button...
- aaroneous 16y agoI know that article is a little old so it advocates a png, but today Safari, Chrome, IE and Moz all support gradients (albeit each in their own way).