3 ms·
I guess in a blog post announcing new fonts I would expect to see the system in action. If performance is an issue then I won't want to buy your product, right?
by yellowbkpk 16y ago
I guess in a blog post announcing new fonts I would expect to see the system in action. If performance is an issue then I won't want to buy your product, right? All I'm saying is I'm surprised you're not using your own product on a product announcement blog post :-).
On the other hand, I suppose most websites only embed one or two unique fonts.
- daychilde 16y agoAs a typekit user, I have insight into this. It's as PaulHammond said: Embedding fonts means downloading a copy of the whole font. TypeKit tracks how big the font files are. Each font might only be ~20-30K - but that's one weight/style. If you use multiple weights and styles, that's 20-30K per each. It's easy to rack up 3-4 weights, and of course I want italics on some of those == 4 weights times 2 italics times 3 fonts = 20-30k times 24 and now we're talking half a meg or so... If I'm demoing 18 fonts on a page, even at a single weight and style - that's approaching half a meg right there. I think using an image is the right call. But if you want to see TypeKit in action (I get no benefit from pushing them - I'm just a satisfied user), here's a couple of sites I'm using it on: http://picklepatchpcb.com/ http://picklepatchpcb.com/ http://daychilde.com/ http://daychilde.com/ http://music.isaac.im/ http://music.isaac.im/ http://oilspillupdate.us/ http://oilspillupdate.us/ http://panamacitypc.com/ http://panamacitypc.com/ http://rockincompany.com/ http://rockincompany.com/