3 ms·
The author of the post is trying to prove the negative, that ML can not succeed because GP can not reconcile a successful solution from the the disclosed techno
by zero_intp 9y ago
The author of the post is trying to prove the negative, that ML can not succeed because GP can not reconcile a successful solution from the the disclosed technologies, or that one does not exist. This may be true, but can not be proven.
- bhouston 9y agoDealing with ML often feels like dealing with climate change deniers. But ML has pivoted away from nearly all of their major technology advances at this point, so they are much more likely to deliver now what is likely to be an underwhelming product that is little differentiated from Hololens.