> How can you disagree with it? Assuming this isn't a rethorical question, it seems straight forward to disagree with the "because" part. Just because the auth

> How can you disagree with it? Assuming this isn't a rethorical question, it seems straight forward to disagree with the "because" part. Just because the author suggests something doesn't make it so. Presumably, since most people use themselves as reference, if something doesn't apply to yourself you might disagree with the explanation given and conclude that there are other factor involved i.e. that the problem is something else.