5 ms·
Personally I’m a big fan of the compose key for such matters. (Both OS X and Linux.) The mnemonics I find easier to remember. • Compose . . → … • Compose <
by colanderman 9y ago
Personally I’m a big fan of the compose key for such matters. (Both OS X and Linux.) The mnemonics I find easier to remember.
• Compose . . → …
• Compose < " and Compose > " → “ and ”
• Compose < ' and Compose > ' → ‘ and ’
• Compose / = → ≠
• Compose + - → ±
• (couldn't figure out ≈)
• Compose < = → ≤
• Compose > = → ≥
• Compose o o → °
• (no compose for π)
- anjbe 9y ago> (no compose for π) You can create your own compose sequences in ~/.XCompose. I mapped pi to Compose * p, taking the idea from Plan 9: https://9fans.github.io/plan9port/man/man7/keyboard.html https://9fans.github.io/plan9port/man/man7/keyboard.html
- Freak_NL 9y agoIf a particular compose sequence strikes you as sensible and suitable for everyone, you can submit patches upstream as well. I believe the base tables reside in Xorg, and GTK uses these as an upstream source, but I'm not completely sure. I've did this for vowels with macrons — ā (-a), ō (-o), ū (-u), in particular because they are useful in romanised Japanese.
- chrismorgan 9y ago~~ → ≈ I’ve customised my Compose key quite a bit. I added things like: - Greek characters from Vim’s digraphs, so p star = π, l star = λ, &c. (Looks like WinCompose’s defaults now actually include asterisk-first ones, star p → π, so I might drop my additions.) - Emoji, :), :D, XD, :/, :S, &c. - Improved curly quotes, whereby I super-conveniently type curly quotes all the time: ;; → ‘, :: → “, '' → ’, "" → ”. (Look at them on the keyboard to figure out the reasoning. ∷ is available as 2:.) I contemplated, but didn’t add, Vim’s box drawing digraphs; there are a few collisions, and I only ever use box drawing characters in Vim, so I’ll just use Ctrl+K there. http://temp.chrismorgan.info/.XCompose http://temp.chrismorgan.info/.XCompose is my current .XCompose. I’m using Windows these days, so that’s with WinCompose.
- username223 9y ago> - Emoji, :), :D, XD, :/, :S, &c. Aagh! I mean... and so it comes full circle. Does no one remember when "emoticons" were sideways ASCII art? Does no one wonder why entry (8) in a list gets turned into "open paren smiley face with sunglasses?" Kids these days...
- chrismorgan 9y agoOh, I remember it full well. But even in those comparatively early days when only :-( and :-) had specific Unicode codepoints [HN filters out emoji, imagine the appropriate codepoints yourself], I preferred to use them to :-) and :-(. Why do I use all the fancy Unicode things? Because they’re there!
- colanderman 9y ago~~ doesn't work on OS X ;)