What do you mean "no"? The article literally never mentions atomoxetine outside of quoted text. It mentions it twice in the contextual part of quotes from paper

What do you mean "no"? The article literally never mentions atomoxetine outside of quoted text. It mentions it twice in the contextual part of quotes from papers also dealing with amphetamine variants. There is a single anecdote about atomoxetine. The quote has nothing to do with the drug's action. The point of the anecdote is the researchers' attitude toward the behaviour of young children, in the context of debating their approach to judging side-effects. That is certainly relevant context: the paper in question is also looking at side-effects for amphetamine variants. Strange approaches to behaviour classification likely apply across all the trials involved. Your original comment was that this is confusing. I think it's very clear. I am not left with the impression that results for atomoxetine are being conflated with results for amphetamine variants.