3 ms·
More fluff from Matt Maroon. This is starting to irritate me. Matt is probably a nice guy, but does this article contain any insight for anyone? If not, why ex
by ntoshev 19y ago
More fluff from Matt Maroon. This is starting to irritate me. Matt is probably a nice guy, but does this article contain any insight for anyone?
If not, why exactly is it the top story?
- rms 19y agoIt makes for decent discussion.
- ntoshev 19y agoIt makes for some discussion, but it doesn't start at a particularly high point. I have read much more interesting articles about social networks on this very site, stuff written by Marc Andreesen and Paul Buchheit. For example, the potential of social networks as consumer distribution model or as magnifying social capital is completely ignored here.
- yters 19y agoMatt's ability lies in catalyzing conversation, which is more important than making an article with 100 points but 0 comments.