Twitter is there to make money for its shareholders Everyone already knows Twitter isn't a charity. This fact does not mean that the company can't have a worth

Twitter is there to make money for its shareholders Everyone already knows Twitter isn't a charity. This fact does not mean that the company can't have a worthwhile purpose like "advancing the global, public conversation". They don't have to choose one, they can have both. World leaders are a cash cow for Twitter So what? World leaders can also help defense contractors and kindergarten teachers. How does that affect whether their statements should visible for public conversation? who could seize any of staff or assets by force Are you fucking kidding me?