3 ms·
http://www.paulgraham.com/stuff.html http://www.paulgraham.com/stuff.html Just because space is expensive doesn't mean you should have none.
by pchristensen 16y ago
http://www.paulgraham.com/stuff.html http://www.paulgraham.com/stuff.html
Just because space is expensive doesn't mean you should have none.
- RexRollman 16y agoI love that essay.
- hugh3 16y agoThat's not an argument, that's a link to an essay. Besides, that essay is about "stuff", not "space". Personally I'm not a fan of having too much stuff, but I'm not sure it's so easy to have too much space. I'd have a hundred acres of forest if I could afford such a thing (anywhere convenient). But I don't want, say, a deep-fryer. If you think space is psychologically expensive, why not phrase it in your own words?
- pchristensen 16y agoStuff (in this case, physical possessions as opposed to digital) takes up space. Most people buy space so they can fill it with stuff. If you're buying space because you actually want the space, that's great! But paying for a mortgage, a storage unit, a parking space, etc is space for your stuff. And, as pg explained, stuff can be a problem.
- hugh3 16y agoI think most people get mortgages so they have space for their families, not space for their stuff.