3 ms·
Intel (like any other who wants to run a monopoly) has been trying to evade any responsibilities in wrong-doings either within (FOOF, the 2 new vulns) or withou
by HenryBemis 9y ago
Intel (like any other who wants to run a monopoly) has been trying to evade any responsibilities in wrong-doings either within (FOOF, the 2 new vulns) or without ("inappropriate" practices against competition a couple of decades ago).
This time they got caught with THEIR poop on OUR lunch-box.
They will deny wrong-doing, they will downplay it. I wonder if these vulns are exploitable, who had prior knowledge (e.g. NSA had 20 years of abuse for MS SME), and if they patch them, what new backdoor they now got (because conspiracy nuts apart, no one burns a card unless they got a better one and they just lost control of the previous one).
- sounds 9y agoIntel didn't burn this card. They got burned. By at least three different groups and an individual all at once. What to learn from it? One thing's for sure, Intel could cut the BS when faced with bad PR. It comes across as tone-deaf, defensive, and uninspiring.