Time of purchase product to time of knowledge of flaw allows for time-frame to file lawsuit(s). Example. Intel worked on rushed product to compete against AMD

Time of purchase product to time of knowledge of flaw allows for time-frame to file lawsuit(s). Example. Intel worked on rushed product to compete against AMD threadripper. That time was after the time of the known issue. Thus Intel was investing in continual bad practices and selling known bad products instead of investing in fixing the hardware flaw. Major flaw in a car prevent selling a card until the flaw is fixed. Why shouldn't this also applying to computers that run the cars and other products?