> So then every single thing that pretty much every single monopolist has done is totally fine since, you know, it wasn't genocide? What? I didn't say that it

> So then every single thing that pretty much every single monopolist has done is totally fine since, you know, it wasn't genocide? What? I didn't say that it was "fine". I'm just trying to get a handle on the scope here. When I think of things that are morally reprehensible, I think of the things I mentioned in my post. Clearly, I don't think Uber is there, so I disagree with the notion that they acted in a "morally reprehensible" way. Do I think that they behaved unethically, even criminally so? Yes, I think that you can make a strong case for that. Maybe I'm making a semantic argument? If so, I think I'm getting weary of our constant 24/7 media stream of outrage, and for that I apologize since that's neither here nor there...