The same could be said of any medical treatment. I've known people that believe drug addicts deserve zero treatment because it's all their fault. Same with peop

The same could be said of any medical treatment. I've known people that believe drug addicts deserve zero treatment because it's all their fault. Same with people that did something stupid and got severely injured. 'Where does it end' isn't much of an argument. Instead we should be asking how should we determine where the line is and I believe the answer is simple: If it can be determined that it would result in a significant QoL increase then it should be covered in most cases. A transgender person receiving hormone therapy or reassignment therapy is an example. A victim who lost their nose in an accident and wants to mend their face is another.