2 ms·
I don't see that the GP implied his ousting wasn't a direct consequence of his actions. Anyway, it's not hard to imagine that Travis, despite being aware of ho
by TheSpiceIsLife 9y ago
I don't see that the GP implied his ousting wasn't a direct consequence of his actions.
Anyway, it's not hard to imagine that Travis, despite being aware of how his actions resulted in consequences, may feel hurt, and maybe even remorseful.
It would be a mistake to believe that people who act poorly all lack empathy.
- soneca 9y agoYeah, actually you are right. GP did not implied it and my disagreement on this point is wrongly stated. It would be more properly stated that I do not personally feel bad for Travis being ousted (because is, IMO, a deserved consequence of his acts). And in this case it is not actually a disagreement, just a difference of our reactions.
- TheSpiceIsLife 9y agoOk, cool, thank you. Yeah, I don't feel bad for the guy either. I hope he feels discomfort for the wrongs his enacted. That would, at least, make him human.
- omosokeye 9y agoGreat point, Bad things happened under his leadership, which lead to his exit. Uber was his baby and his actions has created doubt about Uber in the hearts of many. He probably feels really bad about his actions. He probably feels like selling his share might help. Lets cut the guy some slack he's only human.