4 ms·
Point still stands, if you paid for the true cost of parking no one would bat an eye, but the current regime subsidized car use to an insane extent through inef
by 0xB31B1B 9y ago
Point still stands, if you paid for the true cost of parking no one would bat an eye, but the current regime subsidized car use to an insane extent through inefficient land use policies. A true “market rate” bart parking spot would likely be many multiples above the current price when all costs, alternative uses, and competition are factored in.
- closeparen 9y agoAFAIK the private lot at West Oakland is still under $15. Well worth it. But yeah, the $3 BART charges is comically low. If it’s full by 7am, it’s too cheap!
- tmh79 9y agoYou need to widen the universe of competition when you price parking. The universe of competition for an empty parking space is not just "everyone who would want to park here for a day" it is also "all alternative land uses to parking, including housing". A more profitable, and thus more efficient, use of the land would convert likely 99% of all BART parking land to apartments, retail and office space.
- closeparen 9y agoMid-rise subsidized-affordable housing (what will realistically make it through the community's discretion, if anything at all) isn't that efficient.