3 ms·
AMD’s x86/x86-64 Cross licensing agreement terminates if they ever have more than X (I think 30% or 50%) of the desktop and server market share, so I don’t thin
by dannyw 9y ago
AMD’s x86/x86-64 Cross licensing agreement terminates if they ever have more than X (I think 30% or 50%) of the desktop and server market share, so I don’t think so. The agreement purposefully gimps AMD as a minority player.
- lloeki 9y ago> AMD’s x86/x86-64 Cross licensing agreement terminates if they ever have more than X (I think 30% or 50%) Wow I'm surprised this is even legal because it sounds like an implemented monopoly.
- phs2501 9y agoWell if it means that AMD couldn't ship any x86 processors and Intel couldn't ship x86-64 (i.e. AMD64) processors, that effectively means neither of them could ship any modern x86 processors at all, so that's effectively mutually-assured destruction. If that were in any danger of happening I'd bet dollars to donuts it'd be renegotiated immediately since they both stand to lose everything.
- baldfat 9y agoIntel's biggest threat is not AMD but ARM.
- drvdevd 9y agoThis is strange, I’d never heard of this agreement. As I understand it, Intel x86-64 was actually based on AMD’s amd64 design originally. So in reality they are still two separate architectures in a sense?