4 ms·
Oh my god, the never ending sugar non-sense. https://cowseatgrass.org/2016/02/12/sugar-feeds-thyroid/ https://cowseatgrass.org/2016/02/12/sugar-feeds-thyroid/
by jgalvez 9y ago
Oh my god, the never ending sugar non-sense.
https://cowseatgrass.org/2016/02/12/sugar-feeds-thyroid/ https://cowseatgrass.org/2016/02/12/sugar-feeds-thyroid/
http://raypeat.com/articles/articles/sugar-issues.shtml http://raypeat.com/articles/articles/sugar-issues.shtml
- raarts 9y agoWould you care a adding some context or tl;dr to that? You linked to a really long text which - to my eyes - does not reach a conclusion.
- teslabox 9y agoTl/dr: the campaign against sugar is not actually grounded on solid science - it's sort of a disinformation campaign to distract people from the other elephants in the room: rancid deodorized dietary oils, xeno-estrogens and other endocrine disrupters, etc... People with a healthy metabolism can easily burn sugar for energy. Having a high metabolism increases the body's need for other nutrients, which are not present in white sugar. Sugar-rich foods, used in the context of a nutrient-dense diet, can be therapeutic.
- claar 9y agoFrom a myriad of anecdotal evidence from my immediate and extended family, I'm personally convinced that there are significant downsides to America's addiction to sugar. Discussion, debate, close examination of results/methods, and the like are helpful. But calling out an entire research topic as "non-sense" holds back scientific progress, even if the research topic appears fruitless. Many of today's accepted truths were yesterday's non-sense.
- PinkMilkshake 9y agoRay Peat is a quack. cowseatgrass is based on his work.
- jgalvez 9y agoRay Peat is most definitely not a quack. How did you come to that conclusion?