4 ms·
I've only used Ubiquiti in professional settings (offices) so I don't speak for their "home" solutions, but having used Google WiFi since it came out the advant
by dguaraglia 9y ago
I've only used Ubiquiti in professional settings (offices) so I don't speak for their "home" solutions, but having used Google WiFi since it came out the advantages over other solutions is one word: simplicity.
I used to have a Netgear setup with a Nighthawk router and repeaters. It took hours of tweaking until the damn thing worked properly. Even after properly setup, performance on the main bedroom was terrible (~6Mbps down, when the living room was doing 120Mbps down consistently.) Handover between APs was terrible too: going from the living room to the bedroom there was a 50/50 chance your device would get "stuck" on the wrong AP. After installing some custom firmware for the router, I managed to improve that (there's a setting for kicking devices once the signal is below a certain threshold) but that was far from trivial. Going from bedroom to living room was even worse, as the repeater was dumb and wouldn't force a disconnect even with super low-signal. I usually had to turn wi-fi off/on on the device to force a reconnect. Let alone the amount of times the repeater would just stop repeating and needed to be unplugged from the wall to come back to life.
Installing 3 Google WiFi APs took me all of ten minutes, performance is excellent across the apartment and I don't have to deal with AP handover. It just works. And it cost about the same money as the original setup cost, with 0 of the aggravation.
- giobox 9y agoSame situation here - also came close to pulling trigger on Ubiquiti gear. The Google Wifi has been gloriously simple and fast for me. My only real criticism is the insane way it installs updates - at any time, on occasion during online work conference calls, taking the network down with it. The lack of any UI to configure this behavior is maddening.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- dguaraglia 9y agoPersonally I haven't had any issues with updates at weird times (although the very first time after setting them up they took longer than I expected), but it is annoying that there's no UI to configure it. I wonder if they do some kind of load check before triggering the update? You'd expect a persistent connection to delay something like that.