4 ms·
Yes and no – I doubt that we will have enough resources to build a real sync because it's really hard to implement but only a small number of people will use it
by ivm 9y ago
Yes and no – I doubt that we will have enough resources to build a real sync because it's really hard to implement but only a small number of people will use it. It could be possible by making a "team edition" and recovering costs by selling the app to companies but I really don't like the idea of managers spying on their teams by using Qbserve.
But I was contemplating an idea of merging scheduled exports from multiple Macs with a simple web app.
- woolvalley 9y agoMaybe make a multi-computer db selector? That way you don't have to merge databases with a sync algo, just give a drop-down to view your other computers dbs in a read only fashion from some dropbox drive or similar.
- ivm 9y agoAccording to the feedback we've got, the usual goal is to see combined stats from multiple sources. I also have a suspicion that having a DB with multiple connections in a cloud storage wouldn't end well.
- woolvalley 9y agoIt depends if those cloud sync folders do atomic swaps of the files once they do a sync update or if they update in place as your reading the file. The key is making the 'other computers' dbs readonly from the perspective of the client view rendering app.