You're plain reading of the terms skipped over the first part: "We may disclose Guest Information to law enforcement agencies, ..." They are saying right ther

You're plain reading of the terms skipped over the first part: "We may disclose Guest Information to law enforcement agencies, ..." They are saying right there that they may disclose such information. Whether they are breaking state law is a matter for the courts to decide. Apparently the Supreme Court already decided such a matter. I disagree with that decision, if such information should be kept private then it should be illegal for a hotel to require such data. They should only require the information to charge for the room or accept cash with little or no information. Why does the hotel require such information in the first place? But all this does is create yet another bump in the road for law enforcement to do one of the easiest parts of their job, asking a third-party for information.