>And I am saying that the confidence interval on that calculation is just orders of magnitude not tight enough. You're also saying, implicitly, that therefore

>And I am saying that the confidence interval on that calculation is just orders of magnitude not tight enough. You're also saying, implicitly, that therefore we must default to assuming it is incompetence. That link isn't a given. Stating that it is incompetence is also speculation, not some kind of universal backup truth. However, when it comes to that last 5%, I assert that the historical data does not back a claim that Intel's marketing department is incompetent.