3 ms·
I agree, but it really is a bottomless pit though, so I don't get how above poster think it's very wise to approach its cost and subventions by going without li
by hycaria 9y ago
I agree, but it really is a bottomless pit though, so I don't get how above poster think it's very wise to approach its cost and subventions by going without limits, because "bah, taxpayer will pay".
- TeMPOraL 9y agoYou're right, there needs to be a limit. It's a hard decision to make which treatments will get funded and which won't, but it has to be made.
- candiodari 9y agoAnd by making it a decision by some body you make sure that it will be corrupted. By just limiting the money and leaving it to the private sector you make sure it's an actual economic decision. So do you want the extreme rare condition that some important congresscritter's daughter has consume 80% of the medical budget ? This is the way to go.
- TeMPOraL 9y agoThe private sector is absolutely magical at corrupting economic decisions and sucking out all the money that passes through it, so it's not that easy either. > So do you want the extreme rare condition that some important congresscritter's daughter has consume 80% of the medical budget ? This is the way to go. People would scream bloody murder if that happened.