3 ms·
Page 154 says nothing about Intel. Kindly stop feeding the FUD.
by phoe-krk 9y ago
Page 154 says nothing about Intel. Kindly stop feeding the FUD.
- aceoflala 9y ago155 probably
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- dirtbox 9y agoHere's the page for all who wondered. https://image.prntscr.com/image/KDuFv8gRQYeLJG3pO8wwmQ.png https://image.prntscr.com/image/KDuFv8gRQYeLJG3pO8wwmQ.png Within the context of the prior and subsequent pages, it appears to be talking about AMD.
- eleitl 9y agoIt's the page after that. And, no, it doesn't seem to be AMD when looking at the side of the grey bar censoring the vendor.
- coldtea 9y agoCheck the next page. Page numbers are not always reported faithfully on all PDF readers. Besides, a 150+ page document of processor bugs and arcana is hardly FUD.
- dschuetz 9y agoI second that. CPU bugs are the worst you can have. Means that are able to provide insight into instruction space of common CPUs are more valuable then your average particle collider.
- eleitl 9y agoIt's page 155 and they've blanked out the vendor. The bar is too short for Transmeta and too broad for AMD. It could well be Intel, judging from their other slide using Intel in the same location and font.
- seba_dos1 9y agoThe length of the bar tells you nothing, as it simply covers the "(redacted)" text underneath.
- contrarian_ 9y agoThe bar is just the right width for "(redacted)", I wouldn't read into it.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- angled 9y agoI assume OP is meaning p156 (title slide, author slide, +154). That said, is this not so new news? https://twitter.com/xoreaxeaxeax/status/888702029744324608?lang=en https://twitter.com/xoreaxeaxeax/status/888702029744324608?l... https://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/08/11/memory_hole_roots_intel_processors/ https://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/08/11/memory_hole_roots_i...
- Certhas 9y agoPresumably it hasn't been disclosed yet which systems are affected?