>...pointing out what the exploits cannot do (corrupt/modify/delete). That statement is also untrue if you follow the implicit issue to it's inevitable exploit

>...pointing out what the exploits cannot do (corrupt/modify/delete). That statement is also untrue if you follow the implicit issue to it's inevitable exploitable end... Here is an equivalent statement of equal absurdity that intentionally neglects causality: "Our door lock design contains a bug. The bug does not make stuff in your house disappear, does not manifest junkies into the vicinity, nor does it make property spontaneously combust."