> Which is presumably the implied motive for Moxie to trash talk OpenPGP. I'd rather say that Moxie implies that OpenPGP is broken beyond repair and thus the o

> Which is presumably the implied motive for Moxie to trash talk OpenPGP. I'd rather say that Moxie implies that OpenPGP is broken beyond repair and thus the only alternative is his centralized solution. While he doesn't say this explicitly his other post (The ecosystem is moving) says exactly this. Your anecdotal evidence while interesting does not show that OpenPGP cannot be improved, only that given enough government funding you can build a nice centralized, encrypted solution but as the top comment by lmm shows [0] it's not clear what audience is Signal aimed at: > There is no threat model where Signal makes sense. [0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16062193 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16062193