3 ms·
They did, but it wasn't worse than modern TVs. The paradoxical thing is because everything went through the image processor, digital input>processor>analog con
by thinkythought 9y ago
They did, but it wasn't worse than modern TVs. The paradoxical thing is because everything went through the image processor,
digital input>processor>analog conversion>screen
was faster than
analog input>digital conversion>image processor>analog conversion>screen
There's a big thread on AVSforum with people whinging about this somewhere. The upside is, they're still nice to play stuff like switch games on
EDIT: the processing of analog sources, like 480p dvds, laserdisc, etc was superior to cheap modern TVs. They designed the scaler very well for older formats and it really did look quite nice. I remember being totally disappointed by my "high end" samsung tv in 2013~ or so in comparison. The colors are handled especially nice even on like, VHS. Artifacting/macroblocking/banding wasn't an issue with however they were handling the effects/processing which was a noticeable advantage over the flat screens of the era and even more recently