5 ms·
you have to wonder if Dubai is Islam's deliberate way of showing their followers that the western world is messed up? My comment is not an attempt at being rac
by blantonl 16y ago
you have to wonder if Dubai is Islam's deliberate way of showing their followers that the western world is messed up?
My comment is not an attempt at being racist or judgmental, but even the "highest class" Americans probably shake their heads at what is going on there.
- kloncks 16y agoI'm sorry but I don't understand what you're getting at. Could you please elaborate on your point?
- FlemishBeeCycle 16y agoI think he is suggesting that a nebulously defined "Islam" orchestrated the rise and fall of an entire emirate as plot to convince people that "the West" is wrong?
- adrianwaj 16y agoIt could also be a lesson that "if you build, they will come" is misguided - even in the Muslim world.
- abdulhaq 16y agoThis comment is important because it is so offbase and yet is sourced in what a lot of westerners think/know about 'islam'. Frankly, it kind of depresses and scares me a bit how little people understand about the thing that supposedly is causing them so much disruption in their lives. BTW, debt at interest is totally forbidden in Islam so building an entire state and economy on it - as happens in the west also, of course - is totally 'unislamic'.
- kragen 16y agoYou know, I was thinking about this. I don't know much about sharia-compliant finance, but I have the impression that a lot of it works by giving the "lender" something like preferred shares in the venture they're financing — no voting rights, but a defined dividend, and liquidation preference. (I don't know; do you know anything about this stuff?) Dubai might be in much better shape if they had been financed this way instead of through debt at interest. It's hard to tell because the comment you're replying to is so absurd, but perhaps the commenter meant to say that Dubai is a sort of cartoon version of a European state, as imagined by some "Islamic" people who deplore the structure of such states — and thus was doomed to fail. It's hard to read it as other than a gross stereotype, though. Me, it depresses and scares me a bit how little I understand about the human world: not only the "Islamic world", to whatever extent it makes sense to lump together Indonesia, Turkey, and Egypt under a single rubric, but also Africa, India, and China.
- adrianwaj 16y ago"Frank Gaffney addresses the Defense Forum Foundation (DFF) in the House of Representatives on the topic of Shariah and, broadly defined, it's threat within the United States. Some topics include Shariah-Compliant finance and AIG, homeland security and the Muslim Brotherhood." http://youtu.be/5wLEvYcmj_Q http://youtu.be/5wLEvYcmj_Q (goto 12:00) -- the ultimate issue is that there are Muslim supervisors who decide whether money should be lent or not on a case by case basis. It's subjective and it's biased. If the recipient promotes Shariah it's cool, if it's against Shariah, it's not. Shariah compliant finance is stealth jihad.
- abdulhaq 16y agoYour mistake here is thinking that if something is not against the shariah then it must be 'promoting' shariah. That's incorrect. In Islam, everything is allowed (halal) unless it is clearly disallowed (haram), so someone administering a shariah compliant loan only needs to establish that it is not for the purposes of e.g. gambling, prostitution, the alcohol industry etc. If your business is to sell pet food then there would be no problem with that. You don't have to 'promote' shariah to get a loan. Frankly, it's bordering on the absurd to say that shariah-compliant banking (if you find any that really is genuinely compliant, let me know by the way, I can't find one to buy a house) is 'stealth jihad' but again that reinforces my point that the lack of knowledge the west (particularly Americans) has about Islam is scary and makes it so easy for those with a vested interest in war to keep the ball rolling.
- kragen 16y agoThe comment you're replying to is pretty inflammatory. Bravo to you for responding in a rational fashion. About home mortgages — it seems like it would be hard to apply the preferred-share-like structure I described to home mortgage financing. Your house doesn't produce profits that you could share with someone, does it? Maybe you could sign over a fraction of your total family income in exchange for help buying the house: say, one third of your income for twenty years. But that would still be pretty risky for the investor, even more risky than investing in a hotel, where they have a plausible reason to believe that their investment will produce results. (And I have no idea whether it would be legal, either under the shariah or under civil or common law systems.)