4 ms·
> it has links. Use them. If you're trying to prove something, its better to say nothing at all than to post a shitty source. And please don't ask someone else
by nindalf 9y ago
> it has links. Use them.
If you're trying to prove something, its better to say nothing at all than to post a shitty source. And please don't ask someone else to do research that should be done by you.
- nailer 9y agoNot the OP, but the article is full of citations to academic reearch and .gov sites. What else would you like? Clicking a few random links: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19302732 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19302732 http://akademiai.com/doi/abs/10.1556/JEP.12.2014.1.1 http://akademiai.com/doi/abs/10.1556/JEP.12.2014.1.1 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22947829 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22947829 It's fairly obvious to see why notyourday may be frustrated with you saying its a 'a shitty source' and asking them to provide you with research when they just have.
- emodendroket 9y agoI think it's fair to expect someone who wants to use the research to bolster their claims to highlight portions of it that are relevant rather than dumping a bunch of links (or posting an article and expecting someone to follow them all).