3 ms·
> Copying bytes of a track into a buffer for transmission is not the same as storing a complete copy of the track on persistent storage i.e a downloaded copy do
by akvadrako 9y ago
> Copying bytes of a track into a buffer for transmission is not the same as storing a complete copy of the track on persistent storage i.e a downloaded copy done as part of an "offline sync."
Physically they are the same thing. A buffer could be large enough to hold a complete copy and all storage is persistent to greater or lesser degrees.
It sounds like you are claiming if you buffered a small track in a future non-voltile RAM suddenly it's a different license?
The legal difference is intent. What can the user do with the copy and does it feel like a copy.
- bogomipz 9y ago>"Physically they are the same thing. A buffer could be large enough to hold a complete copy and all storage is persistent to greater or lesser degrees." A buffer is generally understood to mean transient storage, so no not the same at all.