3 ms·
I'm no lawyer, but my instincts tell me someone would have to prove that the chips today do not conform to Intel's specs, and that this difference is such that
by ta_wh 9y ago
I'm no lawyer, but my instincts tell me someone would have to prove that the chips today do not conform to Intel's specs, and that this difference is such that the CPU no longer "substantially conforms" to the spec.
> If an instruction does something different than what their specs say on occasion, do they take that to mean it's substantially conforming to their specs?
We're on the same page. What do you think Intel will argue?
Keep in mind Intel did initiate a substantial recall of Pentium CPUs in the late 90s: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentium_FDIV_bug https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentium_FDIV_bug
- mehrdadn 9y agoI mean they would likely argue it's still substantially conforming even if it has bugs that come up, but I'm trying to figure out what kind of a case they could actually win.
- blattimwind 9y agoWhy try to win a case if all you need is a settlement? Going into an actual trial is far riskier than negotiating a settlement, for both sides.