All three of the definitions you provided will work fine. I am denied the fundamental right of expression by copyright. I am denied the fundamental right of s

All three of the definitions you provided will work fine. I am denied the fundamental right of expression by copyright. I am denied the fundamental right of security by DRM. I am denied the fundamental right of privacy by DRM and copyright enforcement. The United States bullies other countries like New Zealand and Sweden to enforce its copyright. Now that Spotify exists, and can afford royalties, all innovation must be done by Spotify, and a select few other incumbents; who are all more likely to favor stability. To do as Spotify did originally (P2P file streaming) is illegal. Section 1201 of the DMCA prevents lawful security research on anything that includes any form of DRM, making the world less secure, making actors less trustworthy, and seriously degrading privacy. It is law that I adamantly disagree with for very real reasons. I am sharing my disagreement with anyone who will listen, and hoping for change. That is not a slippery slope to anarchy: it is democracy.