3 ms·
I understand the impeccable logic behind not building an advertising driven model. I just wonder about the magnitude of the 'problem'[recording ThingsToDo], and
by richtofen 16y ago
I understand the impeccable logic behind not building an advertising driven model.
I just wonder about the magnitude of the 'problem'[recording ThingsToDo], and the cost of the 'solution'[$5/mo]. I would be very curious to see if this sustains the business [founder salaries and server costs].
Regardless, one wishes success to the project.
- extantproject 16y agoThanks!
- mahmud 16y agoI am GTD practitioner and use Emacs' org-mode for it. If you can write an Emacs Lisp library that allows me to sync my Orgs with Redmine, I will happily pay $5/mo for it. If these guys can make a web-based Org-mode, I would pay for it too. Five bucks is nothing, it costs more per month configuring Emacs and org-mode across disparate machines.
- extantproject 16y ago"it costs more per month configuring Emacs and org-mode across disparate machines" This was one of my core frustrations when I started searching for a list system. I wanted all of my "augmented memory" in one place so that I didn't have to deal with multiple copies of the same thing and having to keep it all in sync. I also wanted to be able to access everything from any box. Thanks for your comment! Oh: and I hear 'ya about org-mode + redmine syncing. ;)
- richtofen 16y agoHm. So if there are say - 5000 customers like you, the business is sitting on a potential annual revenue of $300k. Sounds good! Are there 5000 such customers?
- extantproject 16y agoRight! Given that the Internet is about 2 billion people large I'm banking on the idea that we can find a few thousand people that Atombox will be very useful for and that they will pay for it straight-up. Sounds good to us too! ;)