9 ms·
> ...I think we can either assume... If I may posit a third for consideration: for-cause termination is such an insurmountable bureaucratic hurdle that supervi
by metaphor 9y ago
> ...I think we can either assume...
If I may posit a third for consideration: for-cause termination is such an insurmountable bureaucratic hurdle that supervisors pragmatically opt to pursue inter/intradepartmental transfer, effectively making the employee "someone else's problem".
- kodablah 9y agoI'm including that in the lack of accountability. If termination is difficult, surely many inept remain. Accountability is lowered when unenforceable.
- metaphor 9y ago> I'm including that in the lack of accountability. Fair enough and thanks for the clarification. In that case, I definitely agree with your perspective, both logically and anecdotally.
- crdoconnor 9y ago>If termination is difficult, surely many inept remain. And, if the top of the organization is dysfunctional, making termination much easier (especially where 'easier' means 'no obligation to cite justification') just gives the psychos and empire builders more unchecked power. If termination were easier but 80% based upon a majority of coworkers signing a document stating "this person is not doing their job properly" you could raise accountability and euthanize the empire builders at the same time, but somehow I don't think when they say "it's too hard to fire people" that's what they're aiming for.