11 ms·

Presidential pay is not outrageous because those seeking the Presidency should be motivated by public service, not remuneration. Of course, the President doesn

Presidential pay is not outrageous because those seeking the Presidency should be motivated by public service, not remuneration. Of course, the President doesn't really have bills. He or she doesn't exactly pay to rent the White House.

kevin_thibedeau 9y ago
> He or she doesn't exactly pay to rent the White House. Actually the first family does have to pay for many incidentals, like every day food, and it comes in the form of a bill.
patosai 9y ago
It's true that public service is a major part, but another way of thinking about it is if government officials are highly paid, they are less likely to be bribed or act in their own financial self interest and more motivated by what is good for the country. Plus it attracts talent. Singapore is an extreme example of this (perhaps too extreme) - the Prime Minister earns over $1.5M a year.
- myaso 9y ago
  This Singapore comment needs to die before someone else ever repeats it again. Lee Hsien Loong (2004-now) is the son of Lee Kuan Yew (1965-1990) -- compensation has nothing to do with it in this case. Past a certain compensation range you are selecting for greed and nothing else -- if you earn in the top 10% and can't make do I seriously doubt you are 'intelligent' or your children must eat a lot and you have my sympathies.
scottishfiction 9y ago
> should be motivated by public service, not remuneration. It's strange that this should be such a widely held belief given that it relates to the top job in the most capitalistic country on earth.
swarnie_ 9y ago
> the Presidency should be motivated by public service I don't see who this applies to in your last election
pjc50 9y ago
The President is billing the secret service to stay in Trump Tower.
- dbmikus 9y ago
  millstone was saying that the president doesn't pay many bills. He can generate them, though.
dimva 9y ago
Everyone is motivated by remuneration to some degree - the only question is who is remunerating our government officials: the public, or some other party with its own interests? In the US, we've chosen the private sector to remunerate our officials after they've left public service, and our lovely government is the result. Keep in mind that, as a public official earning top wages (~$150k/year) in DC, you can just afford to buy the median home in the area. But if you want a nice house (single-family) in a good neighborhood? Forget it! Whereas if you took your skills to the private sector, finding a place to raise your family would not be a major concern.

kevin_thibedeau 9y ago

> He or she doesn't exactly pay to rent the White House. Actually the first family does have to pay for many incidentals, like every day food, and it comes in the form of a bill.

patosai 9y ago

It's true that public service is a major part, but another way of thinking about it is if government officials are highly paid, they are less likely to be bribed or act in their own financial self interest and more motivated by what is good for the country. Plus it attracts talent. Singapore is an extreme example of this (perhaps too extreme) - the Prime Minister earns over $1.5M a year.

myaso 9y ago
This Singapore comment needs to die before someone else ever repeats it again. Lee Hsien Loong (2004-now) is the son of Lee Kuan Yew (1965-1990) -- compensation has nothing to do with it in this case. Past a certain compensation range you are selecting for greed and nothing else -- if you earn in the top 10% and can't make do I seriously doubt you are 'intelligent' or your children must eat a lot and you have my sympathies.

scottishfiction 9y ago

> should be motivated by public service, not remuneration. It's strange that this should be such a widely held belief given that it relates to the top job in the most capitalistic country on earth.

swarnie_ 9y ago

> the Presidency should be motivated by public service I don't see who this applies to in your last election

pjc50 9y ago

The President is billing the secret service to stay in Trump Tower.

dbmikus 9y ago
millstone was saying that the president doesn't pay many bills. He can generate them, though.

dimva 9y ago

Everyone is motivated by remuneration to some degree - the only question is who is remunerating our government officials: the public, or some other party with its own interests? In the US, we've chosen the private sector to remunerate our officials after they've left public service, and our lovely government is the result. Keep in mind that, as a public official earning top wages (~$150k/year) in DC, you can just afford to buy the median home in the area. But if you want a nice house (single-family) in a good neighborhood? Forget it! Whereas if you took your skills to the private sector, finding a place to raise your family would not be a major concern.