>would anyone care to discuss this? The prescriptive nature of their "argument" that a gender split must be 50-50 or else it's sexism cannot be justified. Enf

>would anyone care to discuss this? The prescriptive nature of their "argument" that a gender split must be 50-50 or else it's sexism cannot be justified. Enforcing outcomes is not an idea that emerges from any chain of reasoning; it is simply tyranny disguised as activism.