2 ms·
The interesting part is that he's only keeping the bare number of shares that he is required to keep. This suggests that he'd likely be 0% invested in the compa
by craftyguy 9y ago
The interesting part is that he's only keeping the bare number of shares that he is required to keep. This suggests that he'd likely be 0% invested in the company (i.e. holding 0 shares) if he had the chance to, meanwhile he continues to try to persuade employees to retain Intel stock to "stay invested in the company."
- w0m 9y agoStaying invested in the company and locking your financial future to it are very different things - diversification is ~almost always a good/sane thing to do. Personally, I tend to sell all of my employers stock when I get it and diversify, though I keep 1 share to 'stay invested'.