3 ms·
If it's "just entertainment," then why should the government (and by extension, we the people) be engaged in propping up the profitability of their industry? I
by redwall_hp 9y ago
If it's "just entertainment," then why should the government (and by extension, we the people) be engaged in propping up the profitability of their industry?
If you can't find a way to make your entertainment profitable without legal protectionism, maybe you don't deserve too.
- saalweachter 9y agoI don't really care if the government is in the business of "propping up the profitability" of the entertainment industry. If the laws were changed to reduce or eliminate copyright protections, I'd be fine with that. I do care about rule of law. If copyright laws are the law of your land, I think that is sufficient reason to follow them, even if you are actively working to get them changed, either because you don't like them specifically or because you don't believe the government should be engaged in unnecessary activities. I don't believe that the existence of copyright law abrogates a fundamental right or denies a fundamental need, so I don't believe there is a legitimate basis for "protest" non-compliance.