> You know I meant they agreed on a compromise that is mutually beneficial In what way not having net neutrality on wireless is beneficial to Google? > why wo

> You know I meant they agreed on a compromise that is mutually beneficial In what way not having net neutrality on wireless is beneficial to Google? > why would Google care to defend against P2P throttling? They do care on landline, on wireless there is not much they can do. They tried hard for the last 10 years but failed as nobody supported them (FCC, telcos and gov). So they are trying to at least get net neutrality on landline. Again, after ten years of battling for net neutrality, what do we have today? Nothing, not a single law to defend it. Google realized that it was not going to happen after lobying for it for years, so they at least are trying to get it on landline while putting wireless on hold (temporarily as the proposal says). What have you done to defend net neutrality?