3 ms·
Apple is notoriously bureaucratic. So its not surprising that innovation is stifled. I really hate this duality b/w innovation and stability... perhaps if more
by pm90 9y ago
Apple is notoriously bureaucratic. So its not surprising that innovation is stifled. I really hate this duality b/w innovation and stability... perhaps if more startups were focused on longer term survivability, it would be better for society overall?
- jagger27 9y agoI wonder if Apple's satellite operations (like the Siri team in Ottawa, Canada, for example) might have some autonomy and self direction simply due to distance from the mothership. As for a shift in startup culture, what is more tempting than 5 to 10 years of hard work into billion dollar exits? Local governments could start offering tax incentives that build over time—or more aggressively, have steep disincentives on corporate takeovers.
- st3fan 9y agoSiri team in Ottawa? I find that hard to believe. Why would such an important team not be on the main campus?
- avg_dev 9y agohttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16052821 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16052821
- kodablah 9y agoThat says they have "begun expanding" there, GGP makes it sounds like "the Siri team" is mostly a "satellite operation".
- nathanvanfleet 9y agoThat explains why Siri doesn't understand beanie but knows the word "toque"
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- cdolan 9y agoSteep incentives for corporate takeovers is a bad idea IMO - that lack of option in a liquidity event would make less companies receive funding. It would be even more risky to our venture capital behind a new idea.
- skywhopper 9y agoInnovation and stability are tautologically in opposition to each other, alas.
- rtpg 9y agoI've found that this doesn't have to be the case. Continuous deployment is a good example where this doesn't hold. You roll out things more quickly... and you experience less issues! When issues happen, the cause is easier to isolate. After all, you only had one day's worth of changes (and not one year's worth). The previous state is more knowable. Testing is more concentrated. Apple's new OS releases are the opposite of this. They release 30 different major changes at once, they all collide, and we end up just assuming that .0 releases will be broken. In an alternate universe, Apple just releases updates to parts of software when it's ready. They don't pin Safari to the OS (because there's not much of a technical reason to). They could pinpoint _when_ "Month 13" started showing up everywhere beyond "when everyone downloaded that 7 gig update". It takes some effort and tooling, but if you're expecting to make changes, a lot of times making the changes piecemeal will mean that post-release stability will increase in many cases.
- ncallaway 9y agoThere are innovations that happen all the time specifically around making things smoother and more stable. Look at air transportation. It was a series of fairly novel and innovative programs that took place to make a new transportation industry the safest by a mile. It was some serious hard work and innovation to make air transportation the safest and most stable way to travel.
- LeoNatan25 9y agoNo, they are perpendicular. An optimal path can be found so that both advance in the desired direction.
- asdjasldkjkljd 9y agoRight, if you innovate too quickly you end up with major security issues like root login with a blank password.
- s73ver_ 9y agoIt might be, but Apple, Google, FB, MSFT, etc, still have the ability to roll one of those giant mining dump trucks full of money up to the founder's doors, so you're always going to have the possibility that they just get bought out.
- 123ol12313 9y agoCan you give me some examples? I heard the IS&T department is plague with it and is a department to avoid at all cost according to Glassdoor.