> I don't think it needs to be an either or. In principle, I certainly agree. But in the reality of contemporary American politics, I think that sometimes we

> I don't think it needs to be an either or. In principle, I certainly agree. But in the reality of contemporary American politics, I think that sometimes we need to make decisions about which path to take. Is it a problem that anybody that knows an address can summon a heavily armed, often poorly trained, sometimes mentally ill group of people to break into a home at that address? Or is it a problem that, given the above, people are actually doing it? I want to suggest that we do actually need to choose one or the other in this situation, and that the answer is flatly the former.